When a trap has failed to the point where it passes steam,
it is easy to ignore or place on our never-ending list of things to do. After
all, what harm is it causing besides wasting a few dollars worth of steam? The process is
still being heated. However, a failed trap may be costing you more than just the loss of a
small amount of steam. It may be costing you a lot more. The Cost of Lost Steam
Lets examine how a trap passing steam can affect your whole system. First, determine
how much the lost steam costs. Since the steam is being lost at saturation conditions (0
psig from the vented receiver) we can determine the amount of Btus that are no
longer recoverable. 0 psig steam contains 970 Btu/lb. So, for every pound of steam we
dont recover, we lose 970 Btus. But were losing more than just that
latent energy. We are also losing sensible energy. Having lost that pound of steam, we
must now replace it with a pound of water and we have to add energy to the new water just
to bring it up to saturation condition (for water it is approximately 1Btu/lb°F).
Lets say the water we are introducing is 60°F. Because we lost our steam through a
vented receiver, we have to raise its temperature to 212°F. And because the steam we lost
had already been treated, there is the additional cost of treating the new water.
Other Effects of Bad Traps
Knowing this information we are able to calculate the loss associated with losing steam
through a bad trap. However, there are other indirect costs related to the failed trap
that are more difficult to calculate. One is the damage caused by water hammer. As steam
enters a condensate return line, there is the chance steam will mix with the condensate
and some of the condensate may flash into steam and recollapse into condensate, causing
water hammer and equipment damage. A failed trap can pressurize the return main resulting
in insufficient differential pressure across other traps draining into the same main as
the failed trap. Consequently, condensate will backup in the processes the traps are
associated with. Then someone will wrongly diagnose these traps as being defective,
possibly even replacing a good trap and still not getting the desired results.
Frustrating! Because the trap has no differential pressure due to the pressurized
condensate line, there is also the possibility of water hammer occurring in the heat
transfer device that cannot drain. Again, the mixing of steam and condensate can cause
water hammer.
Higher Steam Temperatures Problems
This is not the last of the problems that a trap passing steam can cause. With steam
passing through the trap, the return condensate is at a higher temperature, which sounds
like we are saving energy by not having to add as much sensible heat to the condensate to
bring it back up to saturation conditions. But the warmer the condensate is, the more
flash steam there will be. Even worse, the pumps will handle hotter condensate, and this
can have a negative effect on the pump seals. And, the higher the temperature, the less
NPSH (Net Positive Suction Head) we will have available at our pump suctionthe less NPSH
available, the greater the chance for cavitation to occur in our pump. So, the indirect
cost of a trap passing steam may be great. The best solution is to understand the
operation of your traps, survey and test them on a regular basis, and repair or replace
traps when they fail. The cost will always be justifiable. So the next time you have
problems, look at the whole system. Rember that even if the process is still working, a
bad trap may actually cause other, more serious problems.
Reprinted from CounterPoint July 1999, Vol. 6, Issue 2